Clinical Trial Finder
-
Assessing the Long Term Effectiveness and Safety of Biotherapies in the Treatment of Cutaneous Psoriasis
PSOBIOTEQ is a national multicentric prospective cohort of cutaneous psoriasis patients receiving systemic treatment (biotherapy or DMARDs) for moderate to severe cutaneous psoriasis. It is resulting from the merging of two studies that share the same study population but address different objectives: PSOBIO, developed by academic dermatologists and epidemiologists and supported by the National Drug Agency (AGENCE NATIONALE DE SECURITE DU MEDICAMENT ET DES PRODUITS DE SANTE,ANSM) and the ministry of health (PHRC 2009) focusing on safety issues, and Pso-TEQ, developed by industrials at the request of the French Transparency Commission (HAUTE...
18 Years and OverLearn More -
Assessment of Tender & Swollen Joints Count Score Performed by a Rheumatologist And Rheumatology Nurses in Patients With RA and PsA.
This study will establish a comparison in follow-up care of 100 patients between Health Care Practitioners, more specifically the rheumatologist and a trained nurse. The study objective is to show consistency of evaluation between two different health care professionals, a physician and a nurse.
18 Years and OverLearn More -
Assessment of the Clinical and Ultrasound Response to Apremilast by Clinical Evaluation and by a Joint-periarticular-nail Ultrasound Index in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
This study aims to evaluate more objectively, through an imaging technique such as ultrasound, changes in joints and entheses of patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PAs) who will start treatment with Apremilast after the failure of other therapies such as synthetic DMARD (metrotrexato , Leflunomide ...). The hypothesis of the study is that the technique of ultrasound can demonstrate the efficacy of Apremilast in the treatment of patients with active PAs
18 Years and OverLearn More -
Assess the Potential for Adrenal Suppression and Systemic Drug Absorption Following Multiple Dosing With DFD-06
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential of DFD-06 to suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis when applied twice daily for 15 days.
6 Years - 17 YearsLearn More -
Asthma and Atopic Dermatitis Validation of PROMIS Pediatric Instruments
This is designated to validate patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures in itch-specific pediatric skin conditions, such as atopic dermatitis, and examine the ability of a modified stigma instrument to assess the severity and type of stigma experienced in atopic dermatitis and other potentially stigmatizing conditions.
N/A and OverLearn More -
A Study Comparing Risankizumab to Placebo in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Including Those Who Have a History of Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic Therapy(Ies)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of risankizumab in the patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
18 Years and OverLearn More -
A Study Comparing Risankizumab to Placebo in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Who Have a History of Inadequate Response to or Intolerance to at Least One Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Therapy
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of risankizumab versus placebo in subjects with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
18 Years and OverLearn More -
A Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab to Methotrexate in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of risankizumab to methotrexate in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
18 Years and OverLearn More -
A Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo and to Adalimumab in Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to at Least One Non-Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug
This is a Phase 3 multicenter study that includes two periods. Period 1 is designed to compare the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ABT-494 Dose A once daily (QD) and Dose B QD versus placebo and versus adalimumab every other week (eow) in participants with moderately to severely active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and have an inadequate response to non-biologic DMARDs (DMARD-IR). Period 1 is also designed to compare the efficacy of ABT-494 Dose A QD and Dose B QD versus placebo for the prevention of structural progression. Period 2 evaluates the safety, tolerability and efficacy of ABT-494 Dose A QD and Dose B QD in participants with PsA...
18 Years and OverLearn More -
A Study Comparing Upadacitinib (ABT-494) to Placebo in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Have a History of Inadequate Response to at Least One Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (SELECT-PsA 2)
This is a Phase 3 multicenter study that includes two periods. Period 1 is designed to compare the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ABT-494 Dose A once daily (QD) and Dose B QD versus placebo in participants with moderately to severely active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) who have an inadequate response to Biological Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (bDMARDs). Period 2 evaluates the safety, tolerability and efficacy of ABT-494 Dose A QD and Dose B QD in subjects with PsA who have completed Period 1.
18 Years and OverLearn More
The content provided on clinical trials is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical consultation with your healthcare provider. We do not recommend or endorse any specific study and you are advised to discuss the information shown with your healthcare provider. While we believe the information presented on this website to be accurate at the time of writing, we do not guarantee that its contents are correct, complete, or applicable to any particular individual situation. We strongly encourage individuals to seek out appropriate medical advice and treatment from their physicians. We cannot guarantee the availability of any clinical trial listed and will not be responsible if you are considered ineligible to participate in a given clinical trial. We are also not liable for any injury arising as a result of participation.
Supported by
